Sunday, September 26, 2004 Edition: 01,
Section: D, Page 02
BECAUSE THE United States is engaged
in the fight of our lifetime, a war against a radical coalition of
Islamic terrorists bent on the destruction of our very way of life, we
must have a president who understands the nature of the conflict and
who has the fortitude to vigorously wage and win the war. Because we already have such a
president, the Mobile Register enthusiastically endorses the
re-election of George W. Bush. Against the planners of 9/11 and the
cretins who behead the innocent, Mr. Bush is the
right man at the right time. And Vice President Dick Cheney is
the right man to assist him and, if disaster strikes Mr. Bush, to
ascend to the presidency. Quibble, if you must, with some of the
lesser decisions of the Bush-Cheney
administration. The president should have used his veto power to
curb
excessive spending, and should not have pushed through an
ill-considered Medicare drug law. But on the three most vital decisions
of his presidency, Mr. Bush made the right calls. The second big decision, and equally
wise, was to finally enforce 13 years of United Nations resolutions by
leading a coalition to topple the supremely dangerous Saddam Hussein. Iraq under Saddam Hussein was a
constant threat to its neighbors, a documented user of chemical
weapons, a supporter of terrorists, a nightmare of brutality for its
own citizens, and ongoing evidence for all like-minded tyrants that the
free world lacked the resolve to keep a bad man down. Now the state-sponsored killing fields
of innocent civilians are gone from Iraq. Iraq's neighbors no longer
live in fear. Palestinian would-be suicide bombers no longer have
the
incentive of knowing their families will receive cash rewards from
Saddam Hussein. Partly as a result, levels of anti-Israeli
terrorism
have fallen dramatically. Finally, in a diplomatic coup far too
little appreciated, a terrified Moammar Gadhafi has dismantled an
advanced nuclear weapons program in Libya - while, at the same time, a
pan-Arab conference has called for democratic reforms, and states from
the Persian Gulf to Pakistan to the Pacific Ocean have helped arrest
and kill terrorists, seize their finances and disrupt their
communications. John Kerry, on the other hand, keeps
promising, with no evidence, that he could somehow convince the French
to bless our efforts, as he shamefully insults our dozens of real
allies by calling them a "coalition of the coerced and the
bribed."
Especially compared to that ill-advised pettiness, President Bush's
statesmanship has been Olympian. Finally, the third big decision of the
Bush
presidency has been to fight an inherited recession by means of
well-designed, broad-based tax cuts, thus enabling the American economy
to support the war against terrorists. Make no mistake: The mildness of the
quick recession and the strength of the recovery from it have been as
amazing as they have been unappreciated. Faced with the
triple-whammy
of a bursting tech-stock bubble, an inherited spate of corporate
scandals and the attacks of 9/11, the Bush
economic policies succeeded in limiting the damage and then creating a
virtually unprecedented combination of low inflation, low interest
rates and low unemployment. Millions of people were dropped from
the tax rolls altogether, while millions more low-income workers had
their effective tax rates slashed by a third. As a result, the United States has
maintained enough productive capacity to support the war effort and
protect the homeland. All told, this is a mighty solid record
on which the Bush-Cheney
ticket is running. Even against a better opponent than the
defense-cutting, tax-raising, flip-flopping John Kerry, it would be a
record well worth re-election. Against Mr. Kerry, it should be no
contest.
The most important big decision was
to
treat the Islamic terrorists as a military adversary, rather than - as
John Kerry has ill-advisedly said he prefers - as primarily a matter
for intelligence and law enforcement. President Bush has
carried the battle to foreign fields, the better to keep the carnage
from again striking American civilians at home.
The Mobile Register is Alabama's oldest newspaper. Editorial
board members include:
Howard Bronson, publisher; Frances Coleman, editorial page editor;
Mike Marshall, editor;
Quin Hillyer, editorial writer; Jane Nichols, editorial writer;
Robert Buchanan, public editor; and
J.S. Crowe, political cartoonist. "It was a consensus on the part
of our editorial board. We did not take a formal vote; if we had, I
expect two of the group
would have dissented."-Frances Coleman