Paul Bremer, the former head of the Coalition Provisional Authority, gave a speech in which he said that we have never had enough troops on the ground, or we've never had enough troops on the ground. Donald Rumsfeld said he has not seen any hard evidence of a link between Al Qaida and Saddam Hussein. 

Was this approved -- of a report that you requested that you received a week ago that showed there was no connection between Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and Saddam Hussein?

You and Senator Kerry have said that the war in Iraq is the wrong war at the wrong time. 

Does that mean that if you had been president and vice president that Saddam Hussein would still be in power?

If you get a second term, what is your plan to capture him and then to neutralize those who have sprung up to replace him?

He said, "You've got to do" -- you know, he was asked about preemptive action at the last debate -- he said, "You've got to do it in a way that passes the test, that passes the global test where your countrymen, your people understand fully why you're doing what you're doing and can prove to the world that you did it for legitimate reasons." What is a global test if it's not a global veto?

Yet French and German officials have both said they have no intention even if John Kerry is elected of sending any troops into Iraq for any peacekeeping effort. Does that make your effort or your plan to internationalize this effort seem kind of naive?

It's a question of American intelligence. 
If this report that we've read about today is true, and if Vice President Cheney ordered it and asked about this, do you think that, in the future, that your administration or the Bush administration would have sufficient and accurate enough intelligence to be able to make decisions about where to go next?

After four years as vice president now, and with Iran having been declared by your administration as part of the "Axis of Evil," do you still believe that we should lift sanctions on Iran?

Today, a senior member of Islamic Jihad was killed in Gaza. There have been suicide bombings, targeted assassinations, mortar attacks, all of this continuing at a time when the United States seems absent in the peace-making process. 

What would your administration do? 

First of all, do you agree that the United States is absent? Maybe you don't. 
But what would your administration do to try to resolve that conflict?

Are you trying to have it both ways?

What should the government's role be in helping to end the growth of this epidemic?

What qualifies you to be a heartbeat away?

Senator Kerry changed his mind about whether to vote to authorize the president to go to war. President Bush changed his mind about whether a homeland security department was a good idea or a 9/11 Commission was a good idea.
What's wrong with a little flip-flop every now and then?

But what they're a sign of also is that you're going to inherit a very deeply divided electorate, economically, politically, you name it. 
How will you set out, Mr. Vice President, in a way that you weren't able to in these past four years, to bridge that divide?